Effects of cottonseed hull on intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance, blood metabolites and ingestive behaviour of rams

Scientific Reports volume 13, Article number: 2228 (2023) Cite this article

535 Accesses

3 Altmetric

Metrics details

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of cottonseed hull (CH) in the diets of rams on intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance, ingestive behaviour, and blood metabolites. Twenty males, uncastrated with an average body weight of 29.08 ± 4.18 kg, were distributed in a completely randomized design with four treatment diets and five replicates. The diet contained a forage to concentrate ratio of 50 : 50 (ground corn, soybean meal, corn silage, and CH), and the experimental treatments were inclusion of 0, 10, 20, and 30% CH (dry matter basis). Inclusion of CH linearly increased water intake, effective intake of ethereal extract and non-fibrous carbohydrates, and crude protein digestibility. Dry matter (DM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility, nitrogen faecal losses, and nitrogen balance reduced linearly with CH inclusion in the diet. Inclusion of CH in rams’ diet reduces intake, nutrient digestibility, and intake and rumination efficiencies. Thus, it is not recommended to add this by-product to the diet of high-performance rams, but for nurture that does not aim at high performance, inclusion of up to 5% of this by-product is recommended.

The high cost of animal feed in confinement systems is undoubtedly one of the biggest barriers to the adoption of this system by farmers. However, alternative feeds included in this scope make the profits of these systems more evident, making them more attractive to those who explore them1. However, the viability of using agroindustry by-products in ruminant feed requires research to characterize them, and to determine their nutritional value and the need for purification, as well as conservation, storage, and marketing2,3.

Among the several by-products that Brazilian agroindustry offers, cotton is the most used in animal feed because it is a culture that generates a series of by-products such as lump, cake, and meal, as well as linter, cottonseed hull, and delinted cottonseed, which are still little worked and studied in the scientific community.

Cottonseed hull (CH) is obtained during processing for oil production. It is composed of an outer layer of cottonseed with some linter adhered. It has a high content of fibre and lignin (25, 96, 79 and 11%, respectively) unattractive for non-ruminants’ diets, but it may be an interesting option in ruminant feeding4.

According to Ref.5, cotton lump and CH are by-products rich in neutral detergent fibre that is not derived from forage; that is, due to the processes that they suffer in agroindustry to obtain the primary products, the fibre presents smaller granulometry and so greater gravity6, which theoretically result in a shorter feed retention time in the rumen. Thus, research on feeding behaviour becomes a very important tool in diet evaluation through quantification of the time spent feeding, ruminating, and idle7,8. In view of the above, we hypothesized that CH can replace traditional sources of forage such as silage or hay, which becomes an interesting alternative from an economic and environmental point of view.

Thus, studies that make inferences about alternative products are of paramount importance to better target strategies within intensive production systems. In this study, the aim was to evaluate the intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance, ingestive behaviour, and blood metabolites of rams fed with CH in the diet.

Nutrients intake in g/animal/day for all nutritional fractions, decreased linearly (P < 0.05), except for intake of water (L/day) which showed no effect of CH inclusion in the rams’ diet (Table 1).

Regarding the composition of the diet effectively consumed by animals, it can be observed that there was no significant effect (P > 0.05) on CP from CH inclusion in the animals’ diet. Cottonseed hull inclusion increased linearly the effective intake of EE and NFC (P < 0.05) while the effective intake of NDFap decreased linearly.

Cottonseed hull inclusion in rams’ feed linearly reduced (P < 0.05) the apparent digestibility of DM by 0.80 percentage units for each 1% CH included. The control treatment had 70.2% DM digestibility, while the highest inclusion level of CH had 42.2%. The same behaviour (P < 0.05) was observed for the apparent digestibility of NDF and EE.

The apparent digestibility of CP increased linearly (P = 0.011) as the amount of CH increased in the diet. No significant effect (P > 0.05) was observed for the apparent digestibility of NFC and TC.

Nitrogen balance (NB) decrease linearly (P = 0.001) with CH inclusion in the rams’ diet, reducing by 0.51 g/day for each 1% of CH included (Table 2).

Faecal nitrogen (FN) increased linearly (P = 0.009) from 0.04 g/day for every 1% of CH included in the animals’ diet, whereas nitrogen lost by urine (UN), plasma urea (BU), and glucose showed no significant effect (P > 0.05) of CH inclusion in rams’ feed, averaging 3.19 g/animal/day, and 19.24 and 72.35 mg/dL, respectively.

The inclusion of CH in the diets affected most variables for the ingestive behaviour measured in time (h) and distributed in the daytime and night-time periods (Table 3).

The inclusion of CH did not affect significantly (P > 0.05) the time spent eating (all day) and in daytime nor time spent rumination in night-time, with mean values of 173, 110 and 240 min/day, respectively.

The animals’ night-time eating, and daytime rumination reduced linearly (P < 0.05), while time spent idleness during daytime and night-time increased (P < 0.05) when CH was included in rams’ feed.

In relation to the period of day, it can be observed that the times spent in daytime feeding and rumination were longer than the night-time ones (P < 0.05), while the time spent idling did not differ statistically (P > 0.05).

All data regarding eating and rumination rate (g DM and NDF/h) decreased linearly (P < 0.05) by inclusion of CH in the rams’ diet.

Time spent idling and the number of ruminated boluses per day increased linearly (P < 0.05), while total chewing time, and time spent ruminating decreased linearly with CH inclusion.

The decrease of nutritional fraction intake may be related to animals’ selectivity, because due to the physical form of CH with the presence of a plume, it does not mix homogeneously with the other ingredients of the diet, resulting, almost exclusively, in intake of concentrate and corn silage.

In studies with cotton by-products9 checking 0, 10, 20 and 30% CH in the diet of feedlot cattle, verified that during the initial period of confinement, the animals selectively restricted cottonseed hull; however, during the experiment, this selectivity was reduced, and it did not affect the intake of DM, MO, CP, NDF and NFC (kg/day).

Several authors have also reported an increase in nutrient intake by cattle with diets containing CH10,11,12. In the present study, throughout the period of confinement, rams were more selective than cattle, since they maintained a greater restriction of CH. This behaviour shows the difference in feeding habits of these animals. According to Refs.13,14, sheep are highly selective for feed because they have greater lip mobility, while cattle have low selectivity.

The decrease in CP intake can be explained by the decrease in DM intake from animals fed with CH in the diet, because according to Ref.15 the amount of dietary nitrogen limits fibrous fraction digestion (Table 2) because it does not allow proper development of ruminal microorganisms, reducing the passage rate to the abomasum and consequently limiting the animal’s intake by filling.

Through the composition of the diet effectively consumed (Table 4), it is possible to prove the animals’ selectivity to the diet offered, because according to the chemical composition of the diets, the EE content was from 4.03 to 3.46%, NFC from 53.08 to 47.19%, and NDFap from 28.45 to 35.47% between 0 and 30% inclusion; when the composition of the diet effectively consumed was observed, the EE content was from 2.78 to 3.77%, NFC from 51.32 to 96.86% and NDFap from 41.11 to 19.53%. This difference between the diet offered and the composition of the diet effectively consumed indicates that the animals had a predilection for the concentrate and corn silage, because they presented a higher percentage of EE and NFC and a lower one of NDFap, in relation to CH.

The decrease in EE and NFC intake, may be related to the decrease in DM intake associated with a decrease of these nutrients on inclusion of CH in diets (Table 6). According to Ref.13, diets containing more than 7% EE can affect DM intake by energy density, an observation that cannot be attributed to this research because the experimental diets showed maximum concentrations of 4% EE.

Even with the decrease in CP and EE intake, the nutritional fractions used for the calculation of TC, the ash intake increased with the inclusion of CH in the animals’ diets, which prevented an increase in TC intake.

The diets did not significantly affect the animals’ water intake, which showed a mean of 2.34 L. This result is lower than that recommended by Ref.8 of 2.870 L/animal, which can be associated with a low DM intake because it has a direct influence on this variable.

The decrease in DM digestibility on inclusion of CH in rams’ diets may be associated with the high C fraction of carbohydrates (41.95%) and C fraction of proteins (23.47%) in CH (Table 5). According to Ref.16, digestibility may be associated with several factors such as chemical composition, food preparation, kinetics and passage rate in the gastrointestinal tract of animals, animal-dependent factors, and nutritional status.

The apparent digestibility of CP increased by 0.373 percentage units for every 1% of by-product inclusion. According to Ref.13, an increase in the digestibility of this nutritional fraction may be related to the diet being kept for a longer period in the rumen, as can be observed by the high value of fraction (c) of DM from CH (Table 5), which gave the microorganisms a longer action time on the food particles, thus increasing PB apparent digestibility. Similar data were described by Ref.17 when evaluating intake and apparent digestibility in sheep fed with grains and by-products from canola.

The apparent digestibility of NDF decreased by 0.69 percentage units for every 1% of CH inclusion, which may be related to decreased DM digestibility, which is associated with the decrease in nitrogen availability due to lower CP intake with the increase of CH in the diet. According to Ref.18, diets with low nitrogen availability can decrease the digestibility of fibrous constituents from the cell wall due to nitrogen compound deficiency for the ruminal microorganisms’ development.

There was a decrease of 0.60% in the apparent digestibility of EE for every 1% of CH included in the diets, which may be related to the lower content of this nutritional fraction in the CH compared to corn silage (Table 4). The apparent digestibility of NFC and TC were not influenced by the inclusion of CH in the rams’ diet, which may be associated with the animals’ selectivity since the concentrate and corn silage intake was higher for all treatments.

Nitrogen balance decreased with the inclusion of CH in the diets, due to the decrease in CP intake (Table 1) associated with greater nitrogen loss through faeces (Table 2). Nitrogen in the faeces is the sum of indigestible protein from food, bacterial cell nitrogen which multiples in the large intestine using endogenous urea, and peeling. This information corroborates the data in Table 2, which were verified through the C fraction from the protein of CH which presented, on average, 23.47% indigestible protein that is not absorbed by the small intestine in animals and is lost through faeces.

Blood urea (BU) and glucose had averages of 19.23 and 72.35 mg/dL (Table 2). However, it is worth mentioning that the BU concentrations in this research are below those prescribed as ideal for sheep, from 24.0 to 60.0 mg/dL19, which shows that protein intake was lower than expected for the animal category used in this research, due to the animals’ selectivity to the diet. However, mean values for glucose were within the reference range for sheep, 50–80 mg/dL20.

When evaluating the ingestive behaviour of animals (Table 3), it was observed that in the night-time period (18.00 h to 05.50 h), there was a reduction in the feeding of animals. This probably occurred due to the last offer of feed in the day having been at 15.30 h, and the act of providing food (between 07.30 and 15.30 h) stimulating the animals to go to the trough, resulting in a higher feed intake close to the time of offer since, in this mentioned period, ruminants have a predisposition to look for feed and it is associated with animal selectivity shortly after the offering, resulting in an increase in feeding by animals in the daytime (06.00 h to 17.50 h). This way, at night-time, the animals had no more food to select and reduced their going to the trough.

Daytime rumination was reduced, whereas there was no effect on night-time rumination on inclusion of CH, but when evaluating the periods of the day it was observed that night-time rumination was superior to that in the daytime. According to Ref.13, ruminants prefer to feed in the daytime, while at night-time they prefer to ruminate or be idle. Regardless of the time of day, the time spent idling increased with CH inclusion, probably due to a decrease in DM intake as the amount of by-product increased, providing the animals with more time idling.

DM and NDF intake (min/kg) decreased with CH inclusion (Table 1) and caused the animals to spend more time feeding, decreasing DM and NDF feeding rate (Table 6). This is probably because of animals’ selectivity; they preferred concentrate feed and corn silage to CH (Table 4). Lower acceptability of CH in relation to other ingredients in the experimental diets is probably correlated with the lysine and fibre content (structural carbohydrates) that this by-product has in great proportion compared to corn grain and soybean meal (Table 4).

According to Ref.13, the rate of ingestion and rumination of DM can be influenced by the particle size and fibre content of food, given the greater difficulty that animals would have in reducing the size of the particles originating from fibrous materials, increasing the retention time of the food and consequently decreasing feed intake. However, it is important to note that the particle size of the CH by-product supplied to the animals is shorter in length and smaller than the grass fibre usually grazed in extensive production systems, thus not only the fibre size but also the type of carbohydrate and its effectiveness should be considered. Research by Ref.21 which evaluated the inclusion of babassu cake (0, 7.5, 15, and 22.5%) in the diet of feedlot sheep, showed no effect on DM and NDF eating rate (g/h), so the authors attributed this result to intake of DM and NDF having no effect, a result that corroborates the explanation of a direct relationship between these variables.

The number of ruminated boluses per day and total chewing time (min/day) decreased, probably due to the reduction in DM intake when CH was added to the experimental diets (Table 1). Reference22 obtained the opposite result for this variable, that is, an increase occurred in the number of ruminated boluses and consequently in the ruminating activity, which shows the connection between these variables.

The decrease in the time spent ruminating may be associated with low acceptability by rams of CH. The animals selected more concentrate and corn silage than CH (Table 1), thus, due to the lower NDF content, there was a lower rumination stimulus. However, the increase in the time spent idling can be justified by the decrease in rumination activity, and because the feeding time was not influenced by the diet, thus the animals that received the highest level of CH remained idle for longer.

The inclusion of CH in the diet of feedlot rams reduces intake, the eating and rumination rate, and nutrient digestibility; therefore, it is not recommended to use this by-product in the diet of high-performance rams. However, the use of up to 5% of this by-product for low-yield animals and for maintaining the BW, in general, is justified.

Animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the principles oriented towards care in the use of research animals developed by the Federal University of Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso, Brazil. The protocol and methods were approved by the animal research ethics committee of the Federal University of Mato Grosso (No. 23108.046399/13-4). Information provided in the manuscript complies with the essential recommendations for reporting of the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org/).

This study was conducted in the metabolism shed of the experimental area of the Animal Science Faculty at the Federal University of Mato Grosso, Rondonópolis Campus, Mato Grosso State, Brazil (16° 28′ S, 50° 34′ W). A total of 24 mixed-breed rams with an average age of 12 months and an average body weight (BW) of 27.6 ± 2.9 kg were allocated to metabolic cages measuring 4.20 × 2 m, equipped with feeders, salt troughs, and drinking fountains. The experiment was performed in May 2015 and lasted 21 days, with 15 days for adaptation to the diets, environment, and management, and 6 days for sample collection.

Samples of ingredients (Table 4) were pre-dried in a forced-ventilation oven at 55 °C for 72 h and ground in a Wiley knife mill (Wiley mill, Arthur H. Thomas, PA, USA) using 1 mm sieves for subsequent analyses of dry matter (DM; method 934.0123), ash (method 924.0523), crude protein (CP; method 976.0623), ether extract (EE; method 945.1623) and acid detergent fibre (ADF; method 973.1823) Neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and ADF were determined using the methods of Ref.24 and had been previously treated with heat stable alpha-amylase25.

The NDF corrections for ash and protein (NDFap) were performed according to Ref.26. The total carbohydrates (TC) were calculated according to Ref.27 the Eq. (1):

The non-fibre carbohydrates (NFC) were calculated in the manner proposed by Ref.28. Hall by the Eq. (2):

The estimated total digestible nutrient (TDNe) content was obtained according to Ref.29 by the Eq. (3):

For the CH, protein fractions (A, B1 + B2, B3, and C) were determined according to Ref.26; carbohydrate fractions (A + B1, B2, and C) as proposed by Refs.28,30 and estimation of the degradation of DM, CP, and NDF (Table 5) according to Ref.31.

Diets were formulated according to Ref.32 containing 11% CP, prepared for rams weighing 30 kg and an estimated gain of 0.1 kg/day. The diet contained a forage to concentrate ratio of 50 : 50, composed of corn silage, ground corn, soybean meal, and CH. The experimental treatments (Table 6) consisted of the inclusion of 0, 100, 200 and 300 g/kg of CH in diets (DM basis). Mineral mixture and water were offered to the animals ad libitum.

The diets were provided twice a day at pre-established times (07.30 h and 15.30 h). Dietary intake was measured daily by the difference in weight between the food offered and the refusals, which were adjusted in order to correspond to 10% of the total amount offered.

Nutrient intake was estimated based on the difference between the total of each nutrient contained in the feed offered and the amount in the refusals, expressed in g/day. Water intake (H2OI) was quantified according to Ref.33. Composition of the diet effectively consumed was calculated by the relation between the nutrient intake and intake of dry matter (DMI), multiplied by 100.

The digestibility assay was performed by the direct method, through the total collection of faeces and refusals from each animal, twice daily. For collection of faeces, appropriate canvas bags were attached to the animals.

The faeces and refusals were dried in a forced-air oven at 55 °C for 72 h. Then, the samples were ground in a Wiley knife mill with a sieve size of 1 mm and stored until chemical analysis according to Ref.23.

The digestibility coefficients (DCs) of DM, CP, NDF, and EE were calculated through the Eq. (4):

In the last 3 days, the urine from each animal was collected to determine the nitrogen balance. Urine collection was performed using buckets arranged under the cages, each containing 50 mL of 50% hydrochloric acid (1 : 1) with distilled water to avoid losses by volatilization of urinary ammonia (NH3)34. The daily urine volume of each animal was recorded, and a 10% aliquot was taken, packed in plastic flasks, and frozen. Before performing the analyses, all aliquots corresponding to each animal were homogenized. Nitrogen balance (NB) was calculated by the difference between total nitrogen ingested (N ingested) and total nitrogen excreted in faeces (faecal N) and in urine (urinary N). The total nitrogen in faeces and urine was determined according to Ref.23 method 976.06.

For determining urea N in plasma, blood was collected on the last day of data collection 4 h after feeding. It was collected from the jugular vein using Vacutainer tubes (EDTA K3 plastic, Osasco, SP, Brazil) then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min to obtain the plasma, which was stored in a freezer at − 20 °C. The plasma was thawed at room temperature and analysed by a colorimetric enzymatic method in a biochemical analyser (Thermo Plate TP Analyzer, People’s Republic of China) using commercial kits for urea determination (Urea 500, Labtest, Lagoa Santa, MG, Brazil). Plasma urea N concentration was obtained by the product of plasma urea concentration and 0.466, corresponding to the N content in urea35. A digital glucose meter (Accu-Chek®, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil) equipped with test tape (tape reagent) was used to read glucose concentrations. Measurements were performed immediately after collecting animal blood36.

The animals’ feeding behaviour was assessed in the last 3 days of the experimental period. All animals were visually observed for 24 h, and observations were recorded at 10 min intervals, which included feeding, rumination, and remaining idle. Data on each animal’s behavioural activities were recorded by trained observers, who were positioned to interfere as little as possible with the animals’ behaviour. Night-time was from 18.00 to 05.50 h, and daytime was from 06.00 to 17.50 h. During the night period, the environment was kept under artificial light. The eating and rumination rates based on DM (g DM/h) and NDF (g NDF/h) were calculated as described previously37. The time and number of chews for each ruminal bolus per animal were recorded (total chewing time min/day).

The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with four treatments and five replicates per treatment. The statistical model is represented by the Eq. (5):

where Yi was the observed dependent variable, μ was the overall mean, αi was the effect of the diet, β was the regression coefficient or functional relationship with the covariate, Xi the observed value of the covariate applied to the experimental unit, \(\overline{{\text{X}}}\) the mean of the covariate and δij was the random error.

The data were subjected to analysis of variance through the PROC GLM command of the SAS statistical package (SAS version 9.1 2003), and the means were subjected to regression analysis through the PROC REG command of the SAS® (9.1) statistical package (SAS University Edition). The initial weight was used in the statistical model as a covariate when significant. Analysis of ingestive behaviour also included a t-test to verify the effect of the period (daytime and night-time). Significance was declared when P ≤ 0.05.

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Pereira, E. S. et al. Supplementation with cashew nut and cottonseed meal to modify fatty acid content in lamb meat. J. Food Sci. 81, 2143–2148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13395 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Santos, P. A. et al. Babassu mesocarp flour in diet of finishing lambs. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 96, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2018.1504635 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Ferro, M. M. et al. Ingestion behaviour of feedlot sheep fed on bean processing residue. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 21, 164–170. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0878 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Chizzotti, M. L. et al. Partial replacement of elephant grass silage with cottonseed hulls. 1. Intake, degradability, and apparent ruminal, intestinal, and total tract digestibilities in steers. R. Bras. Zootec. 34(2), 2093–2102. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000600035 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Moreira, F. B. Subprodutos do algodão na alimentação de ruminantes. PUBVET 2, 1–61 (2008).

Google Scholar

Allen, D. M. & Grant, R. J. Interactions between forage and wet corn gluten feed as sources of fiber in diets for lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 322–331. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74882-X (2000).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Marques, J. A., Pinto, A. P., Abahão, J. J. S. & Nascimento, W. G. Intervals between observations for ingestive behavior evaluation of young bulls in feedlot. Semina Cienc. Agrar. 29, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2008v29n4p955 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Beauchemin, K. A. Invited review: Current perspectives on eating and rumination activity in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 101, 4762–4784. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13706 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Magalhães, K. A. et al. Effects of feeding different levels of cottonseed hulls on production and carcass physical composition and traits of feedlot steers. R. Bras. Zootec. 34, 2466–2474. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000700035 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Moore, J. A., Poore, M. H. & Swingle, R. S. Influence of roughage source on kinetics of digestion and passage, and on calculated extents of ruminal digestion in beef steers fed 65% concentrate diets. J. Anim. Sci. 68, 3412–3420. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68103412x (1990).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bartle, S. J., Preston, R. L. & Miller, M. F. Dietary energy source and density: Effects if roughage source, roughage equivalent, tallow level and steer type on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics. J. Anim. Sci. 72, 1943–1953. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.7281943x (1994).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hall, M. B. & Akinyode, A. Cottonseed hulls: Working with a novel fiber source. In Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium 179–186 (2000).

Van Soest, P. J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant 2nd edn. (Cornell University, 1994).

Book Google Scholar

Santos, B. R. C., Voltolini, T. V. & Salla, L. E. Behavior of grazing. REDVET 11, 1695–7504 (2010).

Google Scholar

Miotto, F. R. C., Restle, J., Neiva, J. N. M., Maciel, R. P. & Fernandes, J. J. R. Intake and digestibility of sheep diets containing levels of babassu-mesocarp meal. Rev. Cienc. Agron. 43, 792–801. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902012000400022 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

McDonald, P., Edwards, R. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. Nutrition Animal 4th edn, 571 (Acribia, 1993).

Google Scholar

Santos, V. C., Ezequiel, J. M. B., Oliveira, P. S. N., Galati, R. L. & Barbosa, J. C. Intake and digestibility of sheep fed grains and by-products of canola. Rev. Bras. Saude Prod. An. 10, 96–105 (2009).

Google Scholar

Oliveira, M. V. et al. Nutrients intake and digestibility of palm kernel cake in sheep diet. Ci. Anim. Bras. 16, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1590/1089-6891V16I225615 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Menezes, D. R. et al. Nitrogen balance, serum and urinary urea nitrogen as metabolic monitors of sheep diets containing dried wine grapes residue. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. An. 7, 169–175 (2006).

Google Scholar

Kaneko, J. J., Harvey, J. W. & Bruss, M. L. Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals 9321 (Academic Press, 1997).

Google Scholar

Sá, H. C. M. et al. Intake and ingestive behavior of crossbred lambs fed with babassu cake (Orbignya spp.). Biosci. J. 31, 107–113 (2015).

Google Scholar

Azevedo, R. A. et al. Ingestive behavior of lambs fed with macauba meal. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 65, 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352013000200027 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis 18th edn. (AOAC International, 2005).

Google Scholar

Van Soest, P. J., Mason, V. C. & Lewis, B. A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 3583–3587. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 (1991).

Article Google Scholar

Mertens, D. R. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beaker or crucibles: Collaborative study. J. AOAC 85, 1217–1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/85.6.1217 (2002).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Licitra, G., Hernandez, T. M. & Van Soest, P. J. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 57, 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3 (1996).

Article Google Scholar

Sniffen, C. J., O’Connor, J. D., Van Soest, P. J., Fox, D. G. & Russell, J. B. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. J. Anim. Sci. 70, 3562–3577. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x (1992).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hall, M. B. Calculation of Non-structural Carbohydrate Content of Feeds that Contain Non-protein Nitrogen 25 (University of Florida, 2000).

Google Scholar

Patterson, T., Klopfenstein, T. J., Milton, T. & Brink, D. R. Evaluation of the 1996 beef cattle NRC model predictions of intake and gain for calves fed low or medium energy density diets. Nebraska Beef Cattle Rep. 73, 26–29 (2000).

Google Scholar

Cabral, L. S. et al. Rates of digestion of protein and carbohydrate fractions for silage corn and elephant grass hay, Tifton-85 and soybean meal. R. Bras. Zootec. 33, 1573–1580. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982004000600025 (2004).

Article Google Scholar

Orskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. 92, 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048 (1979).

Article Google Scholar

National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids 2007 (National Academic Press, 2007).

Google Scholar

Souza, E. J. O. et al. Ingestive behavior and water intake in goats and sheep fed with Maniçoba hay and silage. Rev. Bras. Saude Prod. An. 11, 1056–1067 (2010).

Google Scholar

Zeoula, L. M. et al. Digestibility and nitrogen balance of sheep diets containing different levels of ruminal degradable protein and ground corn. R. Bras. Zootec. 35, 2179–2186. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982006000700039 (2006).

Article Google Scholar

Carvalho, G. G. P. et al. Nitrogen balance, urea concentrations and microbial protein synthesis in goats fed diets containing sugar cane treated with calcium oxide. R. Bras. Zootec. 39, 2253–2261. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010001000022 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Macedo Junior, G. L. et al. Intake, digestibility and glycemic curve of sheep in the end of pregnancy receiving different roughage: Concentrate relation. Ci. Anim. Bras. 13, 180–188 (2012).

Google Scholar

Burger, P. J. et al. Ingestive behavior in Holstein calves fed diets with different concentrate levels. R. Bras. Zootec. 29, 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982000000100031 (2000).

Article Google Scholar

Download references

The authors also wish to thank the Foundation for Research Scientific and Technological Development of Maranhão (FAPEMA-Brazil), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES-Brazil, finance code 001) and the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rondônia (IFRO/DEPESP/Colorado do Oeste) for their financial support.

Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Maranhão, Chapadinha, MA, 65500-000, Brazil

Anderson M. Zanine, Daniele J. Ferreira, Henrique N. Parente, Michelle O. M. Parente, Anny Graycy V. O. Lima, Thiago V. C. Nascimento, Francisco Naysson S. Santos & Cledson G. Sá

Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, 78735-901, Brazil

Wanderson J. R. Castro & Alexandre L. Souza

Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil

Marinaldo D. Ribeiro

Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Areia, PB, 58397-000, Brazil

Edson M. Santos & Juliana S. Oliveira

Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rondônia, Colorado do Oeste, RO, 76993-000, Brazil

Fagton M. Negrão

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

A.M.Z. designed the project. W.J.R.C. wrote the manuscript. W.J.R.C. and D.J.F. designed the methodology and collected the data. A.L.S., M.D.R. and C.G.S. conceptualized the idea for this work and critically revised the manuscript. A.M.Z., D.J.F., H.N.P., M.O.M.P., E.M.S., J.S.O., A.G.V.O.L., T.V.C.N., F.N.S.S. and F.M.N. approved the final version of the manuscript.

Correspondence to Anderson M. Zanine.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Zanine, A.M., Castro, W.J.R., Ferreira, D.J. et al. Effects of cottonseed hull on intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance, blood metabolites and ingestive behaviour of rams. Sci Rep 13, 2228 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29005-0

Download citation

Received: 02 March 2022

Accepted: 27 January 2023

Published: 08 February 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29005-0

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.